Apify vs Firecrawl
Comparing architecture, runtime limits, open-source licenses, and monthly costs for autonomous agent pipelines.
Detailed Specifications & Compatibility Matrix
Extracted directly from GitHub REST API & official developer documentation
| Technical Feature / Metric | Apify | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Developer / Organization | Apify Technologies (Jan Čurn & Jakub Balada) | Mendable AI |
| Open-Source Engine | ✓ Open Source (Apache-2.0) | ✓ Open Source (AGPL-3.0) |
| GitHub Stars (Repo/SDK) | ★ 26,265 GitHub Stars | ★ 195,258 GitHub Stars |
| Core Repository Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Supported SDK Clients | ||
| Self-Hosted Deployment | ✓ Supported | ✓ Supported |
| Docker / Container Ready | ✓ Official Image | ✓ Official Image |
| Model Context Protocol (MCP) | ✓ Native MCP | ✓ Native MCP |
| Billing Architecture | usage based | usage based |
| Developer Free Tier | ✓ Yes $5 free platform credits / mo | ✓ Yes 500 scrape credits / mo |
| Entry Paid Tier (Monthly) | $49 USD / mo | $16 USD / mo |
| Pricing & Cost Architecture | Free tier includes $5/mo in platform credits (~12 compute units). Starter plan is $49/mo ($49 prepaid usage) at $0.40 per Compute Unit (1 CU = 1GB RAM for 1 hour). | Monthly credit quota: Free tier provides 500 scrape credits/mo (1 page = 1 credit; 1 crawl = 1 credit per discovered page). Starter plan is $16/mo for 3,000 credits ($0.0053/page). Growth is $99/mo for 100,000 credits. |
| Key Engineering Insight | Maintains Crawlee, one of the most popular open-source scraping libraries, and hosts a marketplace of over 2,000 ready-made cloud Actors for LLM data ingestion. | Created after developers struggled with fragile Puppeteer scripts for RAG; its scraping cluster processes millions of web pages weekly with automated proxy rotation and stealth headers. |
Strengths & Trade-Offs
Objective engineering evaluation of both platforms
Apify Evaluation
Key Advantages
- ✓ Hosts over 2,000 pre-built scraping and automation Actors for major web services and marketplaces
- ✓ Maintains Crawlee, the gold-standard open-source scraping library with automated proxy management and fingerprinting
- ✓ Official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server support and official SDKs for Python and JavaScript
Limitations & Trade-Offs
- ✕ Pricing based on Compute Units (CUs) can become complex to project across large multi-actor agent workflows
- ✕ Free tier $5 credit allowance is shared across storage, data transfer, and actor compute
Firecrawl Evaluation
Key Advantages
- ✓ Converts complex JavaScript-rendered SPAs and shadow DOM into clean, structured markdown optimized for LLM tokenization
- ✓ Includes built-in automated anti-bot bypass, residential IP rotation, and captcha handling with no external proxy configuration
- ✓ Official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server support and official SDKs for Python and TypeScript
Limitations & Trade-Offs
- ✕ AGPL-3.0 copyleft license requires open-sourcing modifications when self-hosting in proprietary environments
- ✕ Credit consumption scales rapidly on deep recursive crawls across multi-page domains
Source Quotes
Direct excerpts from official documentation backing our extracted specifications
Apify Documentation Proof
"Starter plan at $49/month includes $49 usage and pay-as-you-go scaling at $0.40 per Compute Unit."
"Free tier includes $5 monthly platform credits renew each month."
"Crawlee library is 100% open source and self-hostable with Docker."
Firecrawl Documentation Proof
"Starter plan starts at $16/mo for 3,000 credits with automatic anti-bot bypass."
"Free tier provides 500 scraping credits per month."
"Self-hosting instructions and Docker compose provided in the open source repo."
Frequently Asked Questions: Apify vs Firecrawl
Architectural trade-offs and decision criteria
Is Apify or Firecrawl cheaper for developers?
Apify has a starting price of $49/mo (usage based), while Firecrawl starts at $16/mo (usage based). Apify includes a free tier ($5 free platform credits / mo). Firecrawl offers a free tier (500 scrape credits / mo).
Can I self-host Apify and Firecrawl in my own infrastructure?
Apify is self-hostable under the Apache-2.0 license. In comparison, Firecrawl is available for self-hosting with AGPL-3.0 licensing.
Do Apify and Firecrawl support the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?
Apify has native support for MCP servers. Firecrawl fully supports Model Context Protocol integrations.
Which programming languages have official SDKs for Apify vs Firecrawl?
Apify provides official SDKs in: python, typescript, javascript, curl. Meanwhile, Firecrawl supports: python, typescript, curl.