Apify vs Modal
Comparing architecture, runtime limits, open-source licenses, and monthly costs for autonomous agent pipelines.
Detailed Specifications & Compatibility Matrix
Extracted directly from GitHub REST API & official developer documentation
| Technical Feature / Metric | Apify | Modal |
|---|---|---|
| Developer / Organization | Apify Technologies (Jan Čurn & Jakub Balada) | Modal Labs Inc. (Erik Bernhardsson) |
| Open-Source Engine | ✓ Open Source (Apache-2.0) | ✓ Open Source (Apache-2.0) |
| GitHub Stars (Repo/SDK) | ★ 26,265 GitHub Stars | ★ 528 GitHub Stars |
| Core Repository Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Supported SDK Clients | ||
| Self-Hosted Deployment | ✓ Supported | Hosted Only |
| Docker / Container Ready | ✓ Official Image | ✓ Official Image |
| Model Context Protocol (MCP) | ✓ Native MCP | ✓ Native MCP |
| Billing Architecture | usage based | usage based |
| Developer Free Tier | ✓ Yes $5 free platform credits / mo | ✓ Yes $30 USD in free compute credits every month |
| Entry Paid Tier (Monthly) | $49 USD / mo | Free / Custom |
| Pricing & Cost Architecture | Free tier includes $5/mo in platform credits (~12 compute units). Starter plan is $49/mo ($49 prepaid usage) at $0.40 per Compute Unit (1 CU = 1GB RAM for 1 hour). | Every user receives $30/month in free compute credits perpetually. Pay-as-you-go CPU starts at $0.000015/core-second; NVIDIA GPUs (T4 to H100) are metered per millisecond. |
| Key Engineering Insight | Maintains Crawlee, one of the most popular open-source scraping libraries, and hosts a marketplace of over 2,000 ready-made cloud Actors for LLM data ingestion. | Founded by Erik Bernhardsson (former CTO of Better and creator of Spotify's Annoy algorithm); designed to make cloud infrastructure and GPU clusters feel as seamless as a local Python import. |
Strengths & Trade-Offs
Objective engineering evaluation of both platforms
Apify Evaluation
Key Advantages
- ✓ Hosts over 2,000 pre-built scraping and automation Actors for major web services and marketplaces
- ✓ Maintains Crawlee, the gold-standard open-source scraping library with automated proxy management and fingerprinting
- ✓ Official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server support and official SDKs for Python and JavaScript
Limitations & Trade-Offs
- ✕ Pricing based on Compute Units (CUs) can become complex to project across large multi-actor agent workflows
- ✕ Free tier $5 credit allowance is shared across storage, data transfer, and actor compute
Modal Evaluation
Key Advantages
- ✓ Pure Python infrastructure as code: define container images and cloud jobs using simple '@app.function' decorators
- ✓ Sub-2 second container cold starts with on-demand access to NVIDIA A100, H100, and L4 GPUs without provisioning
- ✓ Automated horizontal scaling across thousands of parallel workers with built-in queueing and output streaming
Limitations & Trade-Offs
- ✕ Proprietary cloud runtime with no self-hosted on-premise execution engine available
- ✕ Workloads must be structured around Modal's Python decorator conventions and cloud serialization rules
Source Quotes
Direct excerpts from official documentation backing our extracted specifications
Apify Documentation Proof
"Starter plan at $49/month includes $49 usage and pay-as-you-go scaling at $0.40 per Compute Unit."
"Free tier includes $5 monthly platform credits renew each month."
"Crawlee library is 100% open source and self-hostable with Docker."
Modal Documentation Proof
"Pay-as-you-go CPU from $0.000015/core-second; GPU compute metered per millisecond."
"Every account gets $30/month in free credits renewing monthly."
"Hosted serverless cloud execution platform managed by Modal Labs."
Frequently Asked Questions: Apify vs Modal
Architectural trade-offs and decision criteria
Is Apify or Modal cheaper for developers?
Apify has a starting price of $49/mo (usage based), while Modal starts at $0/mo (usage based). Apify includes a free tier ($5 free platform credits / mo). Modal offers a free tier ($30 USD in free compute credits every month).
Can I self-host Apify and Modal in my own infrastructure?
Apify is self-hostable under the Apache-2.0 license. In comparison, Modal is proprietary cloud infrastructure.
Do Apify and Modal support the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?
Apify has native support for MCP servers. Modal fully supports Model Context Protocol integrations.
Which programming languages have official SDKs for Apify vs Modal?
Apify provides official SDKs in: python, typescript, javascript, curl. Meanwhile, Modal supports: python.